Nonte is the data integrity and provenance platform for pre-clinical and translational research. QA Companion captures the journey of every result (who did what, when and why) alongside the ELN, LIMS and spreadsheets your lab already runs on.
The data exists. The story of how it came to be doesn’t travel with it. So every time a question lands, from a reviewer, a sponsor, or an inspector, someone reconstructs the past by hand.
ELN, LIMS, spreadsheets, freezer logs, email. The data exists. The story of how it came to be doesn’t travel with it.
Meet Dr Amara.
She did everything right.
Translational research fellow · Lab lead · Principal investigator
Month 1 · What Amara did
01 Ran
Ran the assay. Clean results.
02 Logged
Recorded across the ELN, LIMS and three spreadsheets.
03 Submitted
Shipped results into the programme.
* The review wall
Nine months on, the reviewer asked one question: can you prove this data wasn’t touched? The trail was spread across four tools. She couldn’t. Redo it.
Month 10 · With Nonte
04 Captured
Every change logged, tamper-evident.
05 Defensible
Full lineage, study to submission.
Results defensible by audit.
No redo.
↓40%
Redo tax
reclaimed
RUN_001 · NONTE // COMPONENT: THE_REDO_TAX // STATUS: DEFINED
Amara isn't alone.
Our belief
01
Research gets checked. Then re-checked.
02
When the trail is scattered, results become a liability.
03
Nonte makes them defensible by default.
The proof
0%
of researchers have failed to reproduce another lab’s results.
[ NATURE, 2016 · VERIFY ]
$bn
spent each year on preclinical research that can’t be reproduced.
[ PLOS BIOLOGY, 2015 · VERIFY ]
10–40%
of research effort lost to re-verification: the redo tax.
[ NONTE ANALYSIS · VERIFY ]
Quantify it
What is the redo tax costing your lab?
A rough estimate, your assumptions, in your browser. Move the dials.
Working hours per researcher fixed at
1700/yr.Default starting point — 40% — reflects the deck-cited estimate of research effort spent investigating QA issues. Your figures will vary.
Approximate annual loss
£
0k
0
researcher-hours absorbed by
rework, justification and
audit prep.
What Nonte does
The layer underneath how labs actually work.
Three things. Done quietly, in the background, without rewriting your stack.
Building, room, shelf, rack, drawer, box. The digital record matches the location specifics with every move tracked.
A glance at the product
Every change. Every move. Every signature.
When a question lands — from a reviewer, an inspector, or a sponsor — the timeline is already there. Field changes, status updates, tray moves, form submissions, exports, reactivations. Nothing reconstructed after the fact.
Field-level audit trail tied to user, time and study context
Specimen chain of custody across freezers, racks and trays
Training certifications surfaced alongside the people doing the work
We don’t compete with the tools you have. We make them defensible.
Not a lab notebook.
We sit alongside Benchling, LabArchives, eLabFTW. Your ELN stays.
Not a LIMS or QMS.
Sample tracking and quality systems stay put. We make them defensible.
Not a migration project.
No 12-month roll-out. No data import war. Connect, observe, ship.
Why now
Provenance has quietly become a licence condition.
Between HTA licence audits, MHRA inspections and UKRI data management plans, traceability has moved from courtesy to compliance — and the cost of being caught short has risen with it.