Data provenance · translational research

Stop paying the redo tax.

Nonte is the data integrity and provenance platform for pre-clinical and translational research. QA Companion captures the journey of every result (who did what, when and why) alongside the ELN, LIMS and spreadsheets your lab already runs on. 

Live system signals · QA Companion

The cost of broken provenance

Three places labs quietly bleed time.

The data exists. The story of how it came to be doesn’t travel with it. So every time a question lands, from a reviewer, a sponsor, or an inspector, someone reconstructs the past by hand.

Prove it again.

A reviewer or sponsor questions a result long after the work. Proving it now means tracing email, file versions and operator memory by hand.

Drop everything.

Every inspection triggers the same scramble: logs, versions, signatures and chain of custody, all assembled retroactively under time pressure.

No source of truth.

ELN, LIMS, spreadsheets, freezer logs, email. The data exists. The story of how it came to be doesn’t travel with it.

Meet Dr Amara.
She did everything right.

Translational research fellow · Lab lead · Principal investigator

Month 1 · What Amara did

01  Ran

Ran the assay. Clean results.

02  Logged

Recorded across the ELN, LIMS and three spreadsheets.

03  Submitted

Shipped results into the programme.

* The review wall

Nine months on, the reviewer asked one question: can you prove this data wasn’t touched? The trail was spread across four tools. She couldn’t. Redo it.

Month 10 · With Nonte
04  Captured

Every change logged, tamper-evident.

05  Defensible
Full lineage, study to submission.

Results defensible by audit.

No redo.

↓40%

Redo tax
reclaimed
RUN_001 · NONTE // COMPONENT: THE_REDO_TAX // STATUS: DEFINED

Amara isn't alone.

Our belief

01

Research gets checked. Then re-checked.

02

When the trail is scattered, results become a liability.

03

Nonte makes them defensible by default.

The proof
0 %

of researchers have failed to reproduce another lab’s results.

[ NATURE, 2016 · VERIFY ]

$ bn
spent each year on preclinical research that can’t be reproduced.

[ PLOS BIOLOGY, 2015 · VERIFY ]

10–40%

of research effort lost to re-verification: the redo tax.

[ NONTE ANALYSIS · VERIFY ]

Quantify it

What is the redo tax costing your lab?

A rough estimate, your assumptions, in your browser. Move the dials.

Approximate annual loss
£ 0k
0 researcher-hours absorbed by rework, justification and audit prep.

What Nonte does

The layer underneath how labs actually work.

Three things. Done quietly, in the background, without rewriting your stack.

Capture, don't replace.

Records who did what, when, and why. Automatically, in the background and beside the tools your researchers already use.

Audit-ready by default.

Inspections, peer review, sponsor queries: the evidence is already assembled. No last-minute reconstruction.

Every specimen knows where it lives.

Building, room, shelf, rack, drawer, box. The digital record matches the location specifics with every move tracked.

A glance at the product

Every change. Every move. Every signature.

When a question lands — from a reviewer, an inspector, or a sponsor — the timeline is already there. Field changes, status updates, tray moves, form submissions, exports, reactivations. Nothing reconstructed after the fact.

  • Field-level audit trail tied to user, time and study context
  • Specimen chain of custody across freezers, racks and trays
  • Training certifications surfaced alongside the people doing the work

Per-user activity history

Boundaries, on purpose

What Nonte is not.

We don’t compete with the tools you have. We make them defensible.

Not a lab notebook.

We sit alongside Benchling, LabArchives, eLabFTW. Your ELN stays.

Not a LIMS or QMS.

Sample tracking and quality systems stay put. We make them defensible.

Not a migration project.

No 12-month roll-out. No data import war. Connect, observe, ship.

Why now

Provenance has quietly become a licence condition.

Between HTA licence audits, MHRA inspections and UKRI data management plans, traceability has moved from courtesy to compliance — and the cost of being caught short has risen with it.

Licence audits

Chain of custody, consent records, designated individuals — evidenced on demand, not reconstructed.

Inspections

Data integrity expectations land hardest on the boundaries between systems. That’s where Nonte lives.

Data management plans

Grant conditions increasingly require evidence that traceability is operational, not aspirational.

Book a 20-minute walkthrough.

Using a sample from your own stack. No deck. No procurement conversation. Just the redo tax, quantified for your lab.